1993 Finest noob question.

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

redsoxfan1979

Veteran
400
5.00 star(s)
Joined
Mar 12, 2010
Messages
2,719
Location
New Hampshire
I recently bought a box of 1000 cards and was going through them and got a 1993 Finest card in it. It looks shinny and has a reflective look to it.

Just wondering will it say refractor on the back? How do you tell the difference?

Thanks for any help,
Mike
 
I think all of the Finest are Shiny and Reflective. The Refractors should be Rainbowish. Right?
 
It's not a Refractor. The easiest place to tell is around the name where the background , the gold trim, and the silver nameplate would not have definition.
 
Ok thanks for the help/ I always wondered what the difference was then when I found it in a box figured I should really find out. Nice looking cards though.

Thanks again,
Mike
 
The first Chrome cards!! You can tell by using light on the cards....the refractor card....will have shine like a rainbow (many colors)....and if in the room will no light...will look darker than the chrome cards. Best regards, David
 
Had you happened upon a refractor Griffey, you'd have quite a card there. At one time those topped $1000.

Some people apparently can't tell the difference between the refractor and regular cards. This may have been what started the notation on the back. I visited a shop owner who couldn't see the difference, side by side.
 
Would like to jump in here with another question.........

I'm looking at a 2006 scd catalog and they show the 93 finest refractor inserted 1:9 packs and complete set valued at $6,000. And even though there's more than twice as many cards in the 94 set, inserted at a lower rate of 1:10 the refractors complete set value is only $300.

Why such a difference ?
 
Would like to jump in here with another question.........

I'm looking at a 2006 scd catalog and they show the 93 finest refractor inserted 1:9 packs and complete set valued at $6,000. And even though there's more than twice as many cards in the 94 set, inserted at a lower rate of 1:10 the refractors complete set value is only $300.

Why such a difference ?

It's not a 1:9 packs, it's 1:18 packs. Production of the 1993 Finest was announced at a limited 4000 cases and as such the number could be determined that there were 241 copies per 199 cards in the set, although there are rumors of shortprinting and the suspected SPs go for a premium.
 
I'd love to collect those refractors...

Not sure if I can truly go out of my mind and get the Nolan Ryan refractor promo... :eek:
 
1993 was the first year Finest was produced. The product was only available from hobby dealers and the suggested retail price was $3.99 a pack. This is from an old Beckett magazine that I have. As I recall, these cards sold at a premium. I think my dealer was charging $10 a pack.
 
1993 was the first year Finest was produced. The product was only available from hobby dealers and the suggested retail price was $3.99 a pack. This is from an old Beckett magazine that I have. As I recall, these cards sold at a premium. I think my dealer was charging $10 a pack.

I had remembered it at $3 SMR, but the production was scaled back and many who were preselling got caught short and had to go into the secondary market to fill their orders. Packs topped out at $20 a pack. I remember my first experience with a Refractor was trading an Emmitt Smith promo for a common B.J. Surhoff, the commons booked at $20 at the time, of course regular issues of Tim Salmon were running the same.
 
I think this is a perfect example of past hype carrying over into the future. 241 copies is nothing these days, but the fact that these cards spiked so high at one point has lead to people holding on to the fact that these are "worth" so much more than say an insert today #'d/25. Obviously there is still a demand for these cards and there are enough people willing to pay higher prices now, so the values remain high, as do sellers expectations.

The cards were one of the nicest made at the time and are still probably one of the nicest looking cards made ever. While going through my Dodgers, I am coming across these older 90s sets and reminding myself that although that time frame lead us to what we have today (good and bad), some of the most innovative technology, styles and designs were born. 1993 Flair are some high quality cards for example! They get no respect in the market (mainly due to no super impact rookie cards...imagine if Jeter was in the set?), but I don't know if there is a nicer base cards out there from any period!

When I collected Frank Thomas, that refractor was always considered one of the untouchables for me. As with any other hot issues from that same era (92 Fleer Rookie Sensation, 94 CC Gold, Donruss Elites, etc), if you wait long enough, the prices eventually drop. However, Finest has dropped probably harder than most, but because the spike was so much more than other sets, the new "lower" prices are still expensive. I landed a refractor Thomas card for under $100, which was my goal when they were hot, but I imagine someday I will be ashamed to admit that, much like many of the inflated 90s inserts that dropped by 1000s of % below their peak BVs. How long that will take, I do not know. Right now there are 4 Thomas cards on ebay and the cheapest runs $299!!!
 
Back
Top