Fake serial numbers?

Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.

Back in 09 I bought an Sweet Spot auto numbered to 35. When i checked the Becketts list it was not to be found. After calling Upper Deck they told me it was real but Becketts had it listed at numbered to 10. Looks like UD or Becketts posted wrong information.
 
roy white ....8 letters.....55 cards per letter equals total print run of 440....

(in fact , if you look at the item itself on beckett , the title for that card reads thusly :

2009 Upper Deck Icons Immortal Lettermen #RW Roy White/440 *#{Letters spell out ROY WHITE each letter #'ed to 55#{Total print run 440
 
roy white ....8 letters.....55 cards per letter equals total print run of 440....

(in fact , if you look at the item itself on beckett , the title for that card reads thusly :

2009 Upper Deck Icons Immortal Lettermen #RW Roy White/440 *#{Letters spell out ROY WHITE each letter #'ed to 55#{Total print run 440

WOW ! Just when you think it's impossible for them to make it more complicated .......
 
There are some funny or fake serial out there.....I have a pinnacle summit big bang card serial of (forgot the players name)...two of them with the same serial number on them. Pinnacle print some samples without the serial number on them......I'm thinking someone had a printer which added to the serial to the card to make it worth more....Best regards, David
 
roy white ....8 letters.....55 cards per letter equals total print run of 440....

(in fact , if you look at the item itself on beckett , the title for that card reads thusly :

2009 Upper Deck Icons Immortal Lettermen #RW Roy White/440 *#{Letters spell out ROY WHITE each letter #'ed to 55#{Total print run 440

Awesome, thanks for the explanation! :D
 
This is why on OpenChecklist we try to list each letter as a variation of the card. It seems clearer to list that way as the information is as you see it when looking at the card.

- Jon
 
This is why on OpenChecklist we try to list each letter as a variation of the card. It seems clearer to list that way as the information is as you see it when looking at the card.

- Jon

Jon, I had never heard of OpenChecklist... I checked it out, looks great!
 
Back
Top