Looking for Vintage Trades 1956-192

[schmidtfan]

Hi all,

After a long hiatus, I've updated my vintage wantlist and traders here

https://samstradingpost.com/trader/schmidtfanneeds.aspx

Note: I will take any condition, and most of my traders are low condition. If you are condition sensitive, I will have very little for you, but I'm happy to look.

Also, I don't have many stars, but what I do, I'd like to trade them for similar stars. I.e. I don't want 6 commons for 1 star, even if the values line up.

Thanks for looking and I hope we can help each other out.

 

[brcdad]

I have 1958 Topps #129 VG from your want list available if you would like to trade for something similar from my want list.

 

[schmidtfan]

I have these 1956s you need: 18 VG, 234 F-G, 309 VG-

Would you trade the 1958 and one or two of your 54s for these? We could keep it small as a PWE trade to save on shipping--always a priority for me

 

[brcdad]

I have these 1956s you need: 18 VG, 234 F-G, 309 VG-

Would you trade the 1958 and one or two of your 54s for these? We could keep it small as a PWE trade to save on shipping--always a priority for me

How about:

1956 Topps - 18 VG, 234 F-G, 309 VG-

for

1958 Topps - 129 VG
1954 Topps - 23 G, 46 G

 

[schmidtfan]

Thanks for the quick reply--I double checked and I have 1954 #23--how about 47 or 49 instead? Thanks.

 

[brcdad]

Thanks for the quick reply--I double checked and I have 1954 #23--how about 47 or 49 instead? Thanks.

Sure, I will substitute 1954 - 47 G for 23 G. Let me know if alright to post.

 

[schmidtfan]

Great, I posted it up and will send tonight via PWE.

If you want, I can throw in a really rough 1958 #200 (Bob Keegan)--definitely filler quality only

 

[Scobes]

@schmidtfan

I have these from your vintage wantlist. I am not a good grader, but they are definitely low-end, VG or less.

I have these:
1956 Topps
172 Frank Torre
198 Ed Fitzgerald
312 Andy Pafko

1958 Topps
14 Rip Repulski
472 Joe Jay

1959 Topps
109 Bob Schmidt

1960 Topps
315 Bobby Shantz

I can use any of thsee below - I prefer at least VG and I can use the 1968 Topps 325 first.

I am interested in your:
1968
325
1956
44,138,160,163
1958
7,26,33,65,67,128,168,178,206,252,275,283,300,385,412,434,477

I can send pics or better descriptions of my cards if that helps. Just make me an offer! LMK. Thanks!

Scobes

 

[schmidtfan]

@schmidtfan

I have these from your vintage wantlist. I am not a good grader, but they are definitely low-end, VG or less.

I have these:
1956 Topps
172 Frank Torre
198 Ed Fitzgerald
312 Andy Pafko

1958 Topps
14 Rip Repulski
472 Joe Jay

1959 Topps
109 Bob Schmidt

1960 Topps
315 Bobby Shantz

I can use any of thsee below - I prefer at least VG and I can use the 1968 Topps 325 first.

I am interested in your:
1968
325
1956
44,138,160,163
1958
7,26,33,65,67,128,168,178,206,252,275,283,300,385,412,434,477

I can send pics or better descriptions of my cards if that helps. Just make me an offer! LMK. Thanks!

Scobes

Thanks for reaching out Scobes-it's been a while since we've traded.

The 68 Mota 325 is VG
Unfortunately, all the other cards are Good or worse. Like the 58 Klu (178) needs a description worse than poor. I'm happy to send you exact conditions on all of them, but if you don't want to go below VG, we can maybe work out a PWE trade for the Mota? LMK

 

[calsp3]

PM sent. I may have some cards of interest.

 

[Scobes]

Thanks for reaching out Scobes-it's been a while since we've traded.

The 68 Mota 325 is VG
Unfortunately, all the other cards are Good or worse. Like the 58 Klu (178) needs a description worse than poor. I'm happy to send you exact conditions on all of them, but if you don't want to go below VG, we can maybe work out a PWE trade for the Mota? LMK

@schmidtfan

Hi -

There are others from your tradelist I can use if they are in at least VG condition. Let me know if any of these meet that condition. If not, we can figure out something just for the Mota. LMK. Thanks!

Scobes

1960
5,19,65,90,94,225,248,255,405,410,417,418,428,439

1961
22,68,158

1962
110,192,339,516

1963
153,311,493,509,521,538,546,552,561,562

1964
90,164

1965
206,279,304,328,394,434

1966
31,147,174,177,281,286,321,351,414,486

1967
68,87,341,365,435

 

[schmidtfan]

@schmidtfan

Hi -

There are others from your tradelist I can use if they are in at least VG condition. Let me know if any of these meet that condition. If not, we can figure out something just for the Mota. LMK. Thanks!

Scobes

1960
5,19,65,90,94,225,248,255,405,410,417,418,428,439

1961
22,68,158

1962
110,192,339,516

1963
153,311,493,509,521,538,546,552,561,562

1964
90,164

1965
206,279,304,328,394,434

1966
31,147,174,177,281,286,321,351,414,486

1967
68,87,341,365,435

Thanks for digging deeper! I tried to be very critical in my grading, so here are the ones I can say are definitely VG or better.

1960: 19,90 (EX)

1962: 339 EX- but very OC, almost MC
1963: 493 EX+
1965: 434
1966: 31 EX, 281 EX, 286 EX, 414 EX but MC, 486 (Tommy John)
1967: 67

Where do you think we are in exchange value here? The 63 high number is a pretty high BV card.

 

[Scobes]

Thanks for digging deeper! I tried to be very critical in my grading, so here are the ones I can say are definitely VG or better.

1960: 19,90 (EX)

1962: 339 EX- but very OC, almost MC
1963: 493 EX+
1965: 434
1966: 31 EX, 281 EX, 286 EX, 414 EX but MC, 486 (Tommy John)
1967: 67

Where do you think we are in exchange value here? The 63 high number is a pretty high BV card.

@schmidtfan

I'm not good at figuring out conditions, so here are some pics. All the cards have flaws. The best is the 1959 Topps 109 (no creases, sharp corners, just a little O/C and a little staining on the back) and the worst is the 1956 Topps 198 (beat up, creases, tear, rounded corners, etc) and everything else is in between. Honestly, I'll take the Mota and whatever else you think is fair for the lot. LMK. Thanks!

Scobes

 

[schmidtfan]

@schmidtfan

I'm not good at figuring out conditions, so here are some pics. All the cards have flaws. The best is the 1959 Topps 109 (no creases, sharp corners, just a little O/C and a little staining on the back) and the worst is the 1956 Topps 198 (beat up, creases, tear, rounded corners, etc) and everything else is in between. Honestly, I'll take the Mota and whatever else you think is fair for the lot. LMK. Thanks!

Scobes


View attachment 81726View attachment 81727
View attachment 81728
View attachment 81729

Sorry--went camping this weekend and couldn't reply. Thanks for the scans; I'd like all of these. I will send you back some ASAP.

 

[Scobes]

Sorry--went camping this weekend and couldn't reply. Thanks for the scans; I'd like all of these. I will send you back some ASAP.

@schmidtfan

Hi -

Not a problem - hope you had a good trip. Let me know whenever you get the chance. Thanks!!

Scobes

 

[schmidtfan]

Sorry--went camping this weekend and couldn't reply. Thanks for the scans; I'd like all of these. I will send you back some ASAP.

Again, sorry about the delay. How about these 11 cards for the 7 you pulled? This is everything except the 63 high number

 

[schmidtfan]

oh, and go Phillies!

 

[Scobes]

Again, sorry about the delay. How about these 11 cards for the 7 you pulled? This is everything except the 63 high numberView attachment 81812View attachment 81813

@schmidtfan

Hi -

Sounds good. Trade is posted. Thanks!!

Oh, and Go Phillies!! They won today which is a good start to this series!!

Scobes