Would this happen to also be available for team collectors say like
PENN STATE
Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
I think I would easily have the Jose Canseco supercollector (1120/2615 recognized and over 400 that aren't) tag wrapped up but I don't have the trade qualifier just yet.. its hard when you only collect a player that nobody seems to have cards of..even when you need 12 years worth of them! I need the bench members to step up and help me finish out that qualifier and then I can put in my submission!!
My wife "helped" me withmy annual donations and dropped off the wrong boxes. That means I still have the Canseco cards I listed for you, before. Let me know if you are still interested.
i would like to re-apply.I am up to 499/2470 different cards, a auto hat and this would only help make my collection grow.Heres my Will Clark page:
http://www.freewebs.com/josecasillas/willclarkmasterpage.html
Jose
Would this happen to also be available for team collectors say likePENN STATE
Two questions about becoming a Super Collector:
1) Do we get notified if we don't get accepted as a Super Collector?
2) If we do get notified, about how long does it take to get a response?
1--Yes
2--Depends on how long the voting takes, can be weeks sometimes if the vote is close and some Mods are not present.
Thanks for the quick response. I was just wondering since it has been almost a month.
I'd like to reopen this topic of discussion. Is it possible to be a team supercollector? I know there are some individuals on this site who have some team collections that rival some of our supercollector collections.
Of course, with a team collector, resources just aren't going to allow you to near completion of the entire 100% goal of player collectors. I think it's just as impressive when you are a team collector, and your team collection includes, to your knowledge, the most comprehensive individual collections of lesser known players to exist.
For example, I am almost certain my Auburn collection contains at least 15 collections of individual players that, standing alone, would be the best known to exist (Tommie Agee - complete run, Devin Aromashodu, Karsten Bailey, Tim Carter, Ronney Daniels, Karlos Dansby, Heath Evans, Ben Leard, Chris Martin, Jeris McIntyre, Walter Reeves, Gerald Robinson, Frank Sanders, Dontarrious Thomas, Ed West, and maybe some others). I know I'm not the only one on this site that this applies to.
Again, just throwing the idea out there.
Brandon
Meliah - sent you a PM.
I'm gathering my information now for my players.
This may have been addresses already in the previous 11+ pages, but can we submit more than one application at a time for different players (rather than submitting one, waiting for rejection, submitting another, etc)?
Have you ever considered opening up the voting, say in poll format, to the general population (is that too much of a prison term?)? We only get to see the final results of qualifying collections and don't see the rejections or what those collections contain. I'm not saying the current voting team is not capable of making good selections, but considering the "badge" of supercollector is recognized site wide, wouldn't admission be that much more rewarding if it was recognized/determined by the site as a whole?
It's kinda like the HOF now. There are long running arguments about who deserves it and who doesn't, but the bottom line is if the writers or vet committee doesn't vote you in, you don't make it! That is the same here. If the mod team doesn't think you cut the mustard, you go back to the drawing board. Maybe the general membership here is more strict than the current selection committee, maybe it's more accepting? Who knows. It almost feels a little too sterile or formal the way it is now. Card collecting is supposed to be about fun!
I think the current system works well. I imagine that most applicants are rejected, and I think such rejections are best done from behind the scenes. Also, a smaller committee will tend to be more consistent.
But I hope the Bench awards are on for this year. I enjoyed voting for those last year, and I'm looking forward to seeing how people have improved their collections.