Disclaimer: Links on this page pointing to Amazon, eBay and other sites may include affiliate code. If you click them and make a purchase, we may earn a small commission.
A lot of the card companies used to label their cards as RCs if it was their first card of the player. They never paid any attention to the Beckett's definition of RC. Even now I see people label non rcs as RCs on their trade lists A prime example of this is Mike Piazza's 1993 cards which constantly get labeled that way when in fact his actual RC is 1992 Bowman.
I'm 99% sure that card is card #297 (subject to double checking). i only know that because I've seen it so many times on want lists as the only card people need for the 2006 set.\\
HaHa! I checked and I was right. 2006 Topps is the most recent complete baseball set I have so it was one of the few issues from this Century I am familiar with.. I have a couple of 2007 and 2008 football sets but that is as modern as I get.
Probably because at time a rookie card was your first official licensed card. Manny made his debut that year so that is why he is listed as a rookie. The whole Alex Gordon situation changed all of that, for better or worse.
Beastie Boys!
That's what I was gunna say 'cuz it doesn't rhyme. lol I like the Eminem lyric, "I'm the logo on that Dallas Cowboys helmet, a Star."
That card is super sharp. Ill bet its at least a 6.5 or maybe 7 if back looks just as nice.
I don't know what to say.... "When Darryl posts... he posts BIG!!"
Tomorrow. Im guessing you were in my flickr bucket looking around. LOL It is honest to goodness the next card im gonna show.
