just a heads up....
first week of december a guy saw my listings for 5-card lots of topps rookie of the weeks , flashback fridays , trading card history , and turn back the clocks ....instead of buying or bidding on the lots as they were , he wrote asking if i would sell him 8 complete sets and ship them in a small flat rate box for $6.....
i wrote back to tell him i did not HAVE any complete sets....i also provided him with a complete list of my available quantities for all the cards in the sets and asked which he could use....offered to set up a listing for a lot so he could make a single purchase through ebay....he replied that he didn't need all of them and proceeded to hit the BIN on 10 lots for a total of 50 cards......
fast forward to tonight and i see he has now left feedback for me on 7 of the 10 lots....the feedback he left read like this :
Rec' back from grading company .... Ouch !
Rec' back from grading company .... Ouch ! 8.5
Rec' back from grading company .... Ouch ! 8
Rec' back from grading company .... Whoa 7
his DSR's were also enough to give me a noticeable ding on "item as described" where i'd never fallen below 5.0
i admit , i'm a bit PO'ed of the DSR even more than the feedback....each and every lot he bought had the text in it's description :
'The card pictured is one of the actual cards in this lot and its condition can be considered typical of the remaining unpictured cards ."
Most also had the following line :
"While I would not guarantee any specific grade on the cards in this lot should they be submitted for grading , I would estimate that the average condition of the cards to be Near Mint or better ."
personally , i'm not a fan of grading at all....i'd only even CONSIDER it for vintage items bought purely for resale...definitely not for a batch of 50 cards with BV's in the $1-2 range.....but the decision to grade is a personal choice and i understand that....
BUT....what i really am ticked about is that (assuming he did get them all graded and that they came back with the grades he posted in his feedback) i specifically stated that i considered "the average condition of the cards to be Near Mint or better"....unless i'm wrong , don't most grading companies use a 7 for NM ? 7.5 for NrMt+ (or similar term) ? 8 for NrMt-Mt and so on ? if that is correct , then wouldn't the cards he claimed received 7 , 7'5 , 8 , or 8.5 be accurately described ?
any opinions on this ? i know what i am going to , but curious what others would do in a similar situation .....
i notice he also left similar feedback for another seller today (though THAT seller specifically said in his listings "CARD IS MINT")....
i'd rather not name him publicly , but for anyone curious who wants to join me in blocking him , pm me or email me and provide his id....
first week of december a guy saw my listings for 5-card lots of topps rookie of the weeks , flashback fridays , trading card history , and turn back the clocks ....instead of buying or bidding on the lots as they were , he wrote asking if i would sell him 8 complete sets and ship them in a small flat rate box for $6.....
i wrote back to tell him i did not HAVE any complete sets....i also provided him with a complete list of my available quantities for all the cards in the sets and asked which he could use....offered to set up a listing for a lot so he could make a single purchase through ebay....he replied that he didn't need all of them and proceeded to hit the BIN on 10 lots for a total of 50 cards......
fast forward to tonight and i see he has now left feedback for me on 7 of the 10 lots....the feedback he left read like this :
Rec' back from grading company .... Ouch !
Rec' back from grading company .... Ouch ! 8.5
Rec' back from grading company .... Ouch ! 8
Rec' back from grading company .... Whoa 7
his DSR's were also enough to give me a noticeable ding on "item as described" where i'd never fallen below 5.0
i admit , i'm a bit PO'ed of the DSR even more than the feedback....each and every lot he bought had the text in it's description :
'The card pictured is one of the actual cards in this lot and its condition can be considered typical of the remaining unpictured cards ."
Most also had the following line :
"While I would not guarantee any specific grade on the cards in this lot should they be submitted for grading , I would estimate that the average condition of the cards to be Near Mint or better ."
personally , i'm not a fan of grading at all....i'd only even CONSIDER it for vintage items bought purely for resale...definitely not for a batch of 50 cards with BV's in the $1-2 range.....but the decision to grade is a personal choice and i understand that....
BUT....what i really am ticked about is that (assuming he did get them all graded and that they came back with the grades he posted in his feedback) i specifically stated that i considered "the average condition of the cards to be Near Mint or better"....unless i'm wrong , don't most grading companies use a 7 for NM ? 7.5 for NrMt+ (or similar term) ? 8 for NrMt-Mt and so on ? if that is correct , then wouldn't the cards he claimed received 7 , 7'5 , 8 , or 8.5 be accurately described ?
any opinions on this ? i know what i am going to , but curious what others would do in a similar situation .....
i notice he also left similar feedback for another seller today (though THAT seller specifically said in his listings "CARD IS MINT")....
i'd rather not name him publicly , but for anyone curious who wants to join me in blocking him , pm me or email me and provide his id....
