So I purchased what was thought to be a 1991 Topps Tiffany Maddux card. Card arrives in the mail.
1st issue: Postage due: 44 cents on a bubble mailer that only had 44 cents to start with on it. Those of you who work for the P.O.: Is it possible that a postal worker would have let a bubble mailer slide through with just 44 cents on it? Or would the seller had to have put one stamp on it and then just put it in a mail slot in order for it to go thru the mail?
2nd issue: I open the package and the card is only in a penny sleeve, and thus is also creased in a few places.
3rd issue: It is the wrong card...1991 Tiffany would have the gloss on it...but this is your standard 1991 Topps Maddux card.
So I contact the seller, he first asks me what I want to do. He claims the postal worker put on the stamp, and that "he knows nothing about cards" since he was supposedly selling it for his son. I tell him that I do not want to spend the money to send it back, since it will cost me more than him to send it back properly, but I still want my entire purchase refunded (0.99 + 2.00 shipping).
He replies and pretty much cites Ebay policy about how if I want refunded, I have to return it, and I only get refunded the 2.99 spent, not the return postage. I send him a message back once again re-iterating that it in the end he is neither gaining nor losing nothing, since he'll get his fees back; however, I end up losing a card that was never correctly sent (and damaged), plus the 44 cents I owe the mailman, PLUS the postage I will have to send the card back with.
Am I right in wanting to keep the card (I'm planning on pitching it if I do) and still demand the $2.99 back, or do I have no case, since it is Ebay policy that I have to send it back to get my refund? I know it's not a lot of money, but it is a principle thing.
Concerning a previous issue with another seller, I contacted an Ebay rep about an issue before and they gave me a credit to compensate for my shipping the card back despite my objections, but am not sure if they would do that again for me.
Please let me know your thoughts, sorry for the long read,
John
So after the seller accuses me of wanting to keep the card and get my refund back (said there was "something not right"), I send him back a response stating how for me to send it back would cost much more than he ever spent on shipping to send the card to me. I get no response for close to two days, so I decide to send Ebay a message. I explain to them everything wrong with the problem, I explain that in order for me to properly send it back I would have to pay for DC, so not only was I out the card, but also all the extra shipping. So I asked them if I could receive a refund for the postage due and return shipping.
Within 2 hours, I received a response stating "neither you or the seller is at fault", and then Ebay ended up issuing me a refund for the $2.99 themselves.
Thanks for your all advice.
John
1st issue: Postage due: 44 cents on a bubble mailer that only had 44 cents to start with on it. Those of you who work for the P.O.: Is it possible that a postal worker would have let a bubble mailer slide through with just 44 cents on it? Or would the seller had to have put one stamp on it and then just put it in a mail slot in order for it to go thru the mail?
2nd issue: I open the package and the card is only in a penny sleeve, and thus is also creased in a few places.
3rd issue: It is the wrong card...1991 Tiffany would have the gloss on it...but this is your standard 1991 Topps Maddux card.
So I contact the seller, he first asks me what I want to do. He claims the postal worker put on the stamp, and that "he knows nothing about cards" since he was supposedly selling it for his son. I tell him that I do not want to spend the money to send it back, since it will cost me more than him to send it back properly, but I still want my entire purchase refunded (0.99 + 2.00 shipping).
He replies and pretty much cites Ebay policy about how if I want refunded, I have to return it, and I only get refunded the 2.99 spent, not the return postage. I send him a message back once again re-iterating that it in the end he is neither gaining nor losing nothing, since he'll get his fees back; however, I end up losing a card that was never correctly sent (and damaged), plus the 44 cents I owe the mailman, PLUS the postage I will have to send the card back with.
Am I right in wanting to keep the card (I'm planning on pitching it if I do) and still demand the $2.99 back, or do I have no case, since it is Ebay policy that I have to send it back to get my refund? I know it's not a lot of money, but it is a principle thing.
Concerning a previous issue with another seller, I contacted an Ebay rep about an issue before and they gave me a credit to compensate for my shipping the card back despite my objections, but am not sure if they would do that again for me.
Please let me know your thoughts, sorry for the long read,
John
So after the seller accuses me of wanting to keep the card and get my refund back (said there was "something not right"), I send him back a response stating how for me to send it back would cost much more than he ever spent on shipping to send the card to me. I get no response for close to two days, so I decide to send Ebay a message. I explain to them everything wrong with the problem, I explain that in order for me to properly send it back I would have to pay for DC, so not only was I out the card, but also all the extra shipping. So I asked them if I could receive a refund for the postage due and return shipping.
Within 2 hours, I received a response stating "neither you or the seller is at fault", and then Ebay ended up issuing me a refund for the $2.99 themselves.
Thanks for your all advice.
John
Last edited: