I mean how are you no longer a super collector if your trade rating drops to 4.9? How can you not be a super collector if you only have 18 completed trades?
My thought is if you want to recognize player collectors in some special way and relate it to a trade function, then call it something else. Call it something like Player Collector Specialist or Star Player Collector and leave the "Super Collector" designation to those who self-proclaim it, deserving or not.
My apologies to the author of this idea, but as many of my ideas have been received similarily, this one ain't great!
You should read some of the PM's I get in--you'll see not everyone has glowing things to say about the site or myself
I hope they are from people who are trouble makers to begin with, as I have yet to see anything that would cause me concern over the site or the people here. It's usually the trouble makers who cry the loudest when they are called out for their actions! For instance, I am sure you get an earful from anyone who gets the boot.
Off the subject, but I came across a funny picture today going through some Garvey stuff that you might appreciate. It was from a magazine and had this odd cartoon picture of Garvey where he appeared to be skipping along. Guess who's cartoon mug was tucked away in the corner of the picture...none other than Leon Durham!
bzickefoose1--C'mon man, edit that post and be polite. Everyone is allowed to express their opinions. That comment of yours is uncalled for and rude. This is exactly how that post you're talking about got WAY out of hand.
I'd love to see the submissions though. As I said before, I think the term "super collector" is overused and I look forward to seeing who the staff feels deserves the designation and hopefully those collections are highlighted in some way.
Maybe it wasn't the nicest thing yo say, but look what I was responding to:
He's getting ready to laugh at collections that simply don't measure up to his. I see that as a pretty arrogant comment and I don't think anyone has his back on that one.