Wow! Great research Scobes! Lack of run support is bad enough but even worse when facing the likes of Koufax, Drysdale, Perry and Osteen. Guess he had to be happy he missed Juan Marichal when playing SF!@SymphonicMetal
I had to look this up - why was Gibson so bad on the Cardinals West coast trips? Two reasons - 1) Lack of Run support and 2) Facing High-Quality Pitchers. Here is a breakdown of those 7 games:
4/26 - Dodgers 4, Cardinals 2 - Vs. Sandy Koufax (CG)
5/1 - Giants 2, Cardinals 0 - Vs. Gaylord Perry (CG SHO)
5/6 - Giants 4, Cardinals 2 - Vs. Gaylord Perry (7IP)
6/27 - Giants 2, Cardinals 1 - Vs. Ron Herbel (6.2 Shutout Innings)
7/2 - Dodgers 7, Cardinals 2 - Vs. Claude Osteen
8/18 - Dodgers 3, Cardinals 1 - Vs. Don Drysdale (CG)
9/26 - Dodgers 6, Cardinals 3 - Vs. Claude Osteen
The Cardinals averaged 1.57 runs when Gibson was on the mound against the Dodgers and Giants. Even with Gibson being Gibson, that is hard to overcome. And look at those opponents - Koufax, Perry, and Drysdale. Plus Claude Osteen was a decent pitcher (almost 200 career wins with a 3.30 ERA). The only anamoly is his loss against swingman Ron Herbel (who in all fairness did have a 14-K game in 1964) and that was Gibson's closest game of these 7 - only a 1 run loss. That means Gibson went 21-5 against the rest of the league!
Scobes
The Dodgers were the NL Champs that year and San Fran was 2nd only 1.5 games behind them. San Fran's lineup featured 3 HOFers (Mays, McCovey and Cepeda) and their starting rotation had 2 future HOFers (Perry and Marichal). Talk abouit a loaded team!!





